Barack Obama’s letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei comes against the backdrop of the looming Nov. 24 deadline in nuclear negotiations between the U.S. and Iran, as well as five other world powers.
In a rare outreach to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, President Barack Obama has written a letter about the fight against Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham militants, a common enemy in Syria and Iraq, according to diplomatic sources.
The U.S. and Iran are each engaged in military efforts to degrade the ISIS group, essentially putting the longtime foes on the same side in the campaign against the extremists. However, the Obama administration has repeatedly insisted that it is not co-ordinating and will not co-ordinate its military actions with Iran, though officials from both countries have discussed the matter more broadly.
Obama’s letter to Iran’s powerful religious leader comes against the backdrop of the looming Nov. 24 deadline in nuclear negotiations between the U.S. and Iran, as well as five other world powers. While Obama has previously sent letters to Khamenei, any communication between the two men has been extremely rare.
The United States will not co-operate militarily with Iran
The Wall Street Journal, which first reported that Obama had sent the letter, said it described a shared interest between the U.S. and Iran in fighting the ISIS and stressed that any co-operation on that would be largely contingent on Iran agreeing to the nuclear deal. However, while not confirming or denying the existence of the letter, administration officials said there were still no plans to co-operate or co-ordinate with Iran against the militants.
“The United States will not co-operate militarily with Iran in that effort,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said. “We won’t share intelligence with them.”
Diplomatic sources separately confirmed the existence of the letter to The Associated Press. They did so only on the condition of anonymity to publicly discuss Obama’s outreach.
Obama authorized a U.S.-led air campaign against ISIS fighters in Iraq in August and expanded the mission the following month to neighbouring Syria. The U.S. is taking action alongside several other nations, including a handful of regional partners.
Iran is not part of the U.S. coalition, but it has also been fighting ISIS on the ground. However, Iran’s interests in pursuing ISIS’ defeat differ from those of the Obama administration. Iran is a staunch supporter of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad, who is a target of the militants and opposed by the U.S.
Two chief critics of Obama’s foreign policy, Republican Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, called it “outrageous” that Obama would seek to enlist Iran in its fight against ISIS given Iran’s support for Assad and Shia extremists throughout the region.
Related
Ghoncheh Ghavami, the woman jailed in Iran after trying to attend a volleyball match, sentenced to a year in prison: lawyer
Iran hangs woman convicted of murdering former intelligence agent she accused of trying to rape her
Is Islam inherently violent? Quest for power — not religion — motivating jihadists, author says
Iranian embassy had direct role in funding controversial cultural centre in Ottawa, legal battle over assets reveals
“The consequences of this ill-conceived bargain would destroy the Syrians’ last, best chance to live in freedom from the brutal Assad regime,” the two senators said in a joint statement.
U.S. officials have not ruled out the possibility that a nuclear accord with Iran could open the door to discussions on other issues, but they have sought to keep the delicate negotiations focused solely on Tehran’s disputed nuclear program. The U.S. and its negotiating partners say Iran is pursuing a bomb, while Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.
The prospects for a final agreement remain uncertain, with Obama saying on Wednesday that the ability to secure a deal is an “open question.”
The technical details of the talks have been closely guarded by the negotiating partners — the U.S., Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and Iran. The broad parameters of a potential agreement include Iran cutting back on its number of centrifuges enriching uranium and redesigning a planned heavy water reactor so it doesn’t produce plutonium. Both materials can be used in nuclear warheads.
Read more: https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=8337459687580166853#editor/target=post;postID=4540668246357714513
No comments:
Post a Comment